Black Hole Mass Scaling Relations for Spiral Galaxies. I. $M_{\rm BH}$-$M_{\rm *,sph}$
Benjamin L. Davis, Alister W. Graham, and Ewan Cameron

TL;DR
This study refines the $M_{BH}$-$M_{*,sph}$ relation for spiral galaxies using detailed multicomponent decompositions, revealing a nonlinear, near-quadratic relation that challenges previous merger-based models and includes new correlations with Sersic index and spiral-arm pitch angle.
Contribution
It provides the most comprehensive analysis to date of the $M_{BH}$-$M_{*,sph}$ relation in spiral galaxies, incorporating detailed galaxy decompositions and new correlations with galaxy structural parameters.
Findings
The $M_{BH}$-$M_{*,sph}$ relation is nonlinear with a near-quadratic slope.
Bulges with AGNs follow the same relation as inactive bulges.
New correlations found between $M_{BH}$ and Sersic index, and $M_{*,sph}$ and spiral-arm pitch angle.
Abstract
The (supermassive black hole mass, )-(bulge stellar mass, ) relation is, obviously, derived using two quantities. We endeavor to provide accurate values for the latter via detailed multicomponent galaxy decompositions for the current full sample of 43 spiral galaxies having directly measured values; 35 of these galaxies have been alleged to contain pseudobulges, 21 have water maser measurements, and three appear bulgeless. This more than doubles the previous sample size of spiral galaxies with a finessed image analysis. We have analyzed near-infrared images, accounting for not only the bulge, disk (exponential, truncated, or inclined), and bar but also for spiral arms and rings and additional central components (active galactic nuclei (AGNs), etc.). A symmetric Bayesian analysis finds…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
