TL;DR
This paper investigates a bursty SIS epidemic model on networks, revealing that infection bursts do not alter the localization of disease spread, even as network size grows and eigenvalues diverge.
Contribution
It introduces a bursty SIS model analyzed via mean-field approximation, showing that infection bursts cannot delocalize disease spread on localized networks.
Findings
Maximum near-threshold prevalence tends to zero on localized networks.
Infection bursts do not cause delocalization despite diverging eigenvalues.
Results confirmed on synthetic and real-world networks.
Abstract
To shed light on the disease localization phenomenon, we study a bursty susceptible-infected-susceptible (SIS) model and analyze the model under the mean-field approximation. In the bursty SIS model, the infected nodes infect all their neighbors periodically, and the near-threshold steady-state prevalence is non-constant and maximized by a factor equal to the largest eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix of the network. We show that the maximum near-threshold prevalence of the bursty SIS process on a localized network tends to zero even if diverges in the thermodynamic limit, which indicates that the burst of infection cannot turn a localized spreading into a delocalized spreading. Our result is evaluated both on synthetic and real networks.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
