Grain Boundary Shear Coupling is Not a Grain Boundary Property
Kongtao Chen, Jian Han, Spencer L. Thomas, David J. Srolovitz

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates through MD simulations and theory that grain boundary shear coupling varies with external conditions and is not an inherent property of the boundary itself.
Contribution
The authors develop a microscopic statistical theory for grain boundary migration based on disconnections, explaining the dependence of shear coupling on external driving forces and temperature.
Findings
Shear coupling depends on driving force type and magnitude.
The proposed theory quantitatively matches MD simulation results.
Shear coupling is not an intrinsic grain boundary property.
Abstract
Shear coupling implies that all grain boundary (GB) migration necessarily creates mechanical stresses/strains and is a key component to the evolution of all polycrystalline microstructures. We present MD simulation data and theoretical analyses that demonstrate the GB shear coupling is not an intrinsic GB property, but rather strongly depends on the type and magnitude of the driving force for migration and temperature. We resolve this apparent paradox by proposing a microscopic theory for GB migration that is based upon a statistical ensemble of line defects (disconnections) that are constrained to lie in the GB. Comparison with the MD results for several GBs provides quantitative validation of the theory as a function of stress, chemical potential jump and temperature.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
