The stepping-stone sampling algorithm for calculating the evidence of gravitational wave models
Patricio Maturana Russel, Renate Meyer, John Veitch, Nelson, Christensen

TL;DR
This paper introduces the stepping-stone sampling algorithm as an efficient alternative to thermodynamic integration for calculating the evidence in gravitational wave models, demonstrating improved performance and proposing a new error estimation method.
Contribution
The paper presents the stepping-stone sampling algorithm for evidence calculation, showing it outperforms thermodynamic integration and nested sampling in gravitational wave data analysis.
Findings
Stepping-stone sampling requires fewer temperature steps for the same accuracy.
It demonstrates superior computational efficiency compared to thermodynamic integration.
A novel block bootstrap method for estimating standard errors is proposed.
Abstract
Bayesian statistical inference has become increasingly important for the analysis of observations from the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo gravitational-wave detectors. To this end, iterative simulation techniques, in particular nested sampling and parallel tempering, have been implemented in the software library LALInference to sample from the posterior distribution of waveform parameters of compact binary coalescence events. Nested sampling was mainly developed to calculate the marginal likelihood of a model but can produce posterior samples as a by-product. Thermodynamic integration is employed to calculate the evidence using samples generated by parallel tempering but has been found to be computationally demanding. Here we propose the stepping-stone sampling algorithm, originally proposed by Xie et al. (2011) in phylogenetics and a special case of path sampling, as an alternative…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
