TL;DR
This paper reveals that many recent deep discriminative clustering models are mathematically equivalent to K-means under certain conditions, and introduces a new soft, regularized deep K-means algorithm with competitive results.
Contribution
It establishes a theoretical link between discriminative deep clustering models and K-means, and proposes a novel deep K-means algorithm based on this insight.
Findings
Discriminative models are equivalent to K-means under mild conditions.
The proposed deep K-means algorithm performs well on image clustering benchmarks.
Theoretical analysis bridges the gap between discriminative and generative clustering methods.
Abstract
In the context of recent deep clustering studies, discriminative models dominate the literature and report the most competitive performances. These models learn a deep discriminative neural network classifier in which the labels are latent. Typically, they use multinomial logistic regression posteriors and parameter regularization, as is very common in supervised learning. It is generally acknowledged that discriminative objective functions (e.g., those based on the mutual information or the KL divergence) are more flexible than generative approaches (e.g., K-means) in the sense that they make fewer assumptions about the data distributions and, typically, yield much better unsupervised deep learning results. On the surface, several recent discriminative models may seem unrelated to K-means. This study shows that these models are, in fact, equivalent to K-means under mild conditions and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsLogistic Regression
