Child Mortality Estimation Incorporating Summary Birth History Data
Katie Wilson, Jon Wakefield

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian data augmentation method to improve child mortality estimates by effectively incorporating summary birth history data alongside full birth history data, reducing uncertainty in trend analysis.
Contribution
It develops a novel Bayesian framework that models auxiliary birth and death dates for SBH data, addressing biases and enabling integrated analysis of different data types.
Findings
Uncertainty in mortality estimates decreases when including SBH data.
The method outperforms the Brass method in simulations.
Application to Malawi data demonstrates practical utility.
Abstract
The United Nations' Sustainable Development Goal 3.2 aims to reduce under-5 child mortality to 25 deaths per 1,000 live births by 2030. Child mortality tends to be concentrated in developing regions where much of the information needed to assess achievement of this goal comes from surveys and censuses. In both, women are asked about their birth histories, but with varying degrees of detail. Full birth history (FBH) data contain the reported dates of births and deaths of every surveyed mother's children. In contrast, summary birth history (SBH) data contain only the total number of children born and total number of children who died for each mother. Specialized methods are needed to accommodate this type of data into analyses of child mortality trends. We develop a data augmentation scheme within a Bayesian framework where for SBH data, birth and death dates are introduced as auxiliary…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
