Differences and similarities between lasing and multiple-photon subtracted states
T. Lettau, H.A.M. Leymann

TL;DR
This paper investigates how multiple-photon subtraction affects the statistical properties of light, revealing that thermal states do not become lasing states despite autocorrelation functions converging to one, and establishes criteria for initial states to resemble lasing.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of photon subtraction effects on light states and derives a criterion for initial states to attain pseudo-lasing properties.
Findings
Thermal states do not transform into lasing states after photon subtraction.
Autocorrelation functions at zero delay time converge to one for various states.
A general criterion for initial states to reach pseudo-lasing behavior is established.
Abstract
We examine the effect that the subtraction of multiple photons has on the statistical characteristics of a light field. In particular, we are interested in the question whether an initial state transforms into a lasing state, i.e.,~a (phase diffused) coherent state, after infinitely many photon subtractions. This question is discussed in terms of the Glauber P-representation , the photon number distribution , and the experimentally relevant autocorrelation functions . We show that a thermal state does not converge to a lasing state, although all of its autocorrelation functions at zero delay time converge to one. This contradiction is resolved by the analysis of the involved limits, and a general criterion for an initial state to reach at least such a pseudo-lasing state () is derived, revealing that they can be generated from a large class of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
