Comparison of U-net-based Convolutional Neural Networks for Liver Segmentation in CT
Hans Meine, Grzegorz Chlebus, Mohsen Ghafoorian, Itaru Endo, Andrea, Schenk

TL;DR
This study compares 2D and 3D U-net convolutional neural networks for liver segmentation in CT scans, finding that slice-wise 2D approaches perform remarkably well and may be more practical than 3D methods.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive evaluation of U-net-based neural networks for liver segmentation, highlighting the effectiveness of 2D slice-wise approaches over 3D methods.
Findings
Slice-wise 2D U-net approaches achieve Dice coefficients above 0.97.
2D approaches may be preferable due to current hardware and software limitations.
The study offers a performance comparison of various neural network classifiers for liver segmentation.
Abstract
Various approaches for liver segmentation in CT have been proposed: Besides statistical shape models, which played a major role in this research area, novel approaches on the basis of convolutional neural networks have been introduced recently. Using a set of 219 liver CT datasets with reference segmentations from liver surgery planning, we evaluate the performance of several neural network classifiers based on 2D and 3D U-net architectures. An interesting observation is that slice-wise approaches perform surprisingly well, with mean and median Dice coefficients above 0.97, and may be preferable over 3D approaches given current hardware and software limitations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsConcatenated Skip Connection · *Communicated@Fast*How Do I Communicate to Expedia? · Max Pooling · Convolution · U-Net
