Comments on "Quasi-coherent states for the Hermite oscillator" [J. Math. Phys. 59, 062104 (2018)]
Kevin Zelaya, Oscar Rosas-Ortiz
TL;DR
This paper critiques and corrects a conclusion in Unal's 2018 work on quasi-coherent states for the Hermite oscillator, clarifying key points and addressing potential misunderstandings.
Contribution
It provides a correction to Unal's conclusion and highlights missing points necessary for proper understanding of the original work.
Findings
Corrected the erroneous conclusion in Unal's paper
Clarified essential points missing in the original work
Emphasized the importance of accurate interpretation in quantum state analysis
Abstract
The paper of Unal [J. Math. Phys. 59, 062104 (2018)], though worthy of attention, contains a conclusion that is in error and may mislead the efforts to extend his results. The aim of the present note is twofold: we provide a correction to such a conclusion and then we emphasize some missing points that are necessary to clarify the content of the paper.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.