Can the $\psi(4040)$ explain the peak associated with $Y(4008)$?
Milena Piotrowska, Francesco Giacosa, Peter Kovacs

TL;DR
This study investigates the $ ext{ψ}(4040)$ resonance using a quantum field theory approach, revealing a dynamically generated broad pole near 4 GeV that could explain the observed peak associated with the unconfirmed $Y(4008)$ state.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that the $Y(4008)$ peak may result from loop effects of $ ext{ψ}(4040)$ and $D^{ ext{*}}D$ interactions, challenging its interpretation as a genuine resonance.
Findings
A broad pole at 4 GeV is dynamically generated.
The $Y(4008)$ peak can be explained by loop effects without a new resonance.
The mechanism involves strong coupling of $car{c}$ to $D^{ ext{*}}D$ loops.
Abstract
We study the well-known resonance , corresponding to a charm-anticharm vector state , within a QFT approach, in which the decay channels into , , , and are considered. The spectral function shows sizable deviations from a Breit-Wigner shape (an enhancement, mostly generated by loops, occurs); moreover, besides the pole of , a second dynamically generated broad pole at GeV emerges. Naively, it is tempting to identify this new pole with the unconfirmed state Yet, this state was not seen in the reaction , but in processes with in the final state. A detailed study shows a related but different mechanism: a broad peak at GeV in the process…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
