Ubiquity of superconducting domes in BCS theory with finite-range potentials
Edwin Langmann, Christopher Triola, and Alexander V. Balatsky

TL;DR
This paper analytically demonstrates that finite-range interactions in BCS theory naturally produce superconducting domes, challenging the idea that domes indicate competing orders or exotic superconductivity.
Contribution
It introduces a reliable analytical method to solve the BCS gap equation for finite-range potentials and shows that non-local interactions inherently lead to superconducting domes.
Findings
Finite-range potentials produce non-monotonic T_c(n) domes.
Monotonic T_c growth is an artifact of local interaction assumptions.
Superconducting domes do not necessarily imply competing orders.
Abstract
Based on recent progress in mathematical physics, we present a reliable method to analytically solve the linearized BCS gap equation for a large class of finite-range interaction potentials leading to s-wave superconductivity. With this analysis, we demonstrate that the monotonic growth of the superconducting critical temperature with the carrier density, , predicted by standard BCS theory, is an artifact of the simplifying assumption that the interaction is quasi-local. In contrast, we show that any well-defined non-local potential leads to a "superconducting dome", i.e. a non-monotonic exhibiting a maximum value at finite doping and going to zero for large . This proves that, contrary to conventional wisdom, the presence of a superconducting dome is not necessarily an indication of competing orders, nor of exotic superconductivity. Our results provide a prototype…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
