Benchmark ages for the Gaia benchmark stars

TL;DR

This paper establishes benchmark ages for Gaia stars using literature data and Bayesian isochrone fitting, highlighting challenges in age determination, especially for certain stellar types, and assessing model impacts like atomic diffusion.

Contribution

It provides a systematic approach to determine reliable ages for Gaia benchmark stars, incorporating new Bayesian methods and analyzing model discrepancies.

Findings

Young ages for well-defined giant stars.

Inclusion of α-enhancement resolves some model-observation discrepancies.

Isochrone fitting limitations for stars with high surface gravity.

Abstract

In the era of large-scale surveys of stars in the Milky Way, stellar ages are crucial for studying the evolution of the Galaxy. But determining ages of field stars is notoriously difficult; therefore, we attempt to determine benchmark ages for the extensively studied Gaia benchmark stars which can be used for validation purposes. By searching the literature for age estimates from different methods and deriving new ages based on Bayesian isochrone fitting, we are able to put reliable limits on the ages of 16 out of the 33 benchmark stars. The giants with well-defined ages are all young, and an expansion of the sample to include older giants with asteroseismic ages would be beneficial. Some of the stars have surface parameters inconsistent with isochrones younger than 16 Gyr. Including $\alpha$-enhancement in the models when relevant resolves some of these cases, but others clearly highlight discrepancies between the models and observations. We test the impact of atomic diffusion on the age estimates by fitting to the actual surface metallicity of the models instead of the initial value and find that the effect is negligible except for a single turn-off star. Finally, we show that our ability to determine isochrone-based ages for large spectroscopic surveys largely mirrors our ability to determine ages for these benchmark stars, except for stars with $\log g \gtrsim 4.4$ dex since their location in the HR diagram is almost age insensitive. Hence, isochrone fitting does not constrain their ages given the typical uncertainties of spectroscopic stellar parameters.