LAMOST observations in the Kepler field. II. Database of the low-resolution spectra from the five-year regular survey
Weikai Zong, Jian-Ning Fu, Peter De Cat, Jianrong Shi, Ali Luo,, Haotong Zhang, A. Frasca, C. J. Corbally, J. Molenda- \.Zakowicz, G., Catanzaro, R. O. Gray, Jiangtao Wang, Yang Pan, Anbing Ren, Ruyuan Zhang,, Mengqi Jin, Yue Wu, Subo Dong, Ji-Wei Xie, Wei Zhang, Yonghui Hou

TL;DR
This paper presents the second data release of the LAMOST-Kepler project, providing a large database of low-resolution spectra and derived stellar parameters for over 126,000 stars in the Kepler field, facilitating diverse astronomical research.
Contribution
It offers a comprehensive spectroscopic database with atmospheric parameters for Kepler field stars, derived from five years of LAMOST observations, including nearly 228,000 spectra.
Findings
Coverage of 14 subfields in the Kepler field with over 227,000 spectra.
Derived atmospheric parameters and radial velocities for 173,971 spectra.
Nearly 50% of targets observed by both LAMOST and Kepler, enabling combined analyses.
Abstract
The LAMOST-Kepler (LK-) project was initiated to use the Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope (LAMOST) to make spectroscopic follow-up observations for the targets in the field of the Kepler mission. The Kepler field is divided into 14 subfields that are adapted to the LAMOST circular field with a diameter of 5 degrees. During the regular survey phase of LAMOST, the LK-project took data from 2012 June to 2017 June and covered all the 14 subfields at least twice. In particular, we describe in this paper the second Data Release of the LK-project, including all spectra acquired through 2015 May to 2017 June together with the first round observations of the LK-project from 2012 June to 2014 September. The LK-project now counts 227 870 spectra of 156 390 stars, among which we have derived atmospheric parameters (log g, T eff and [Fe/H]) and heliocentric radial velocity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
