Social Choice Random Utility Models of Intransitive Pairwise Comparisons
Rahul Makhijani

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new multidimensional majority vote model based on Random Utility Models to effectively capture complex intransitive preferences in pairwise comparisons, overcoming limitations of traditional models.
Contribution
The paper proves the non-existence of concave likelihood parametric models for intransitivity and proposes a multidimensional majority vote model inspired by social choice theory.
Findings
The 3D majority vote model can represent arbitrary intransitive cycles.
The model accurately predicts choices in recommendation systems.
It effectively models winners in online games and elections.
Abstract
There is a growing need for discrete choice models that account for the complex nature of human choices, escaping traditional behavioral assumptions such as the transitivity of pairwise preferences. Recently, several parametric models of intransitive comparisons have been proposed, but in all cases the maximum likelihood problem is non-concave, making inference difficult. In this work we generalize this trend, showing that there cannot exist any parametric model with a concave log-likelihood function that can exhibit intransitive preferences. Given this result, we motivate a new model for analyzing intransitivity in pairwise comparisons, taking inspiration from the Condorcet method (majority vote) in social choice theory. The Majority Vote model we analyze is defined as a voting process over independent Random Utility Models (RUMs). We infer a multidimensional embedding of each object…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOpinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Game Theory and Applications
