Cosmological lensing ratios with DES Y1, SPT and Planck
J. Prat, E. J. Baxter, T. Shin, C. S\'anchez, C. Chang, B. Jain, R., Miquel, A. Alarcon, D. Bacon, G. M. Bernstein, R. Cawthon, T. M. Crawford, C., Davis, J. De Vicente, S. Dodelson, T. F. Eifler, O. Friedrich, M. Gatti, D., Gruen, W. G. Hartley, G. P. Holder, B. Hoyle

TL;DR
This paper measures cosmological lensing ratios using data from DES Y1, SPT, and Planck, providing high-precision results that constrain the universe's curvature and demonstrate the potential of future surveys for cosmology.
Contribution
It introduces a method to measure lensing ratios with galaxy and CMB data, achieving the highest precision to date and exploring their use in cosmological constraints.
Findings
Lensing ratio amplitude best fit is 1.1 ± 0.1.
Photometric galaxies can effectively measure lensing ratios.
Future surveys can significantly improve cosmological constraints.
Abstract
Correlations between tracers of the matter density field and gravitational lensing are sensitive to the evolution of the matter power spectrum and the expansion rate across cosmic time. Appropriately defined ratios of such correlation functions, on the other hand, depend only on the angular diameter distances to the tracer objects and to the gravitational lensing source planes. Because of their simple cosmological dependence, such ratios can exploit available signal-to-noise down to small angular scales, even where directly modeling the correlation functions is difficult. We present a measurement of lensing ratios using galaxy position and lensing data from the Dark Energy Survey, and CMB lensing data from the South Pole Telescope and Planck, obtaining the highest precision lensing ratio measurements to date. Relative to the concordance CDM model, we find a best fit lensing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
