The fraction of bolometric luminosity absorbed by dust in DustPedia galaxies
S. Bianchi, P. De Vis, S. Viaene, A. Nersesian, A. V. Mosenkov, E. M., Xilouris, M. Baes, V. Casasola, L. P. Cassar\`a, C. J. R. Clark, J. I., Davies, I. De Looze, W. Dobbels, M. Galametz, F. Galliano, A. P. Jones, S., Lianou, S. C. Madden, A. Tr\v{c}ka

TL;DR
This study quantifies the fraction of stellar radiation absorbed by dust in 814 DustPedia galaxies, revealing weak morphological dependence and a positive correlation with luminosity, challenging existing models of dust and galaxy evolution.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of dust absorption across diverse galaxy types using spectral energy distribution modeling, with new insights into the dependence on luminosity and morphology.
Findings
Average dust absorption fraction is 19% in DustPedia galaxies.
Higher absorption (25%) in late-type, star-forming galaxies.
No variation of absorption with galaxy inclination.
Abstract
We study the fraction of stellar radiation absorbed by dust, f_abs, in 814 galaxies of different morphological types. The targets constitute the vast majority (93%) of the DustPedia sample, including almost all large (optical diameter larger than 1'), nearby (v <= 3000 km/s) galaxies observed with the Herschel Space Observatory. For each object, we model the spectral energy distribution from the ultraviolet to the sub-millimetre using the dedicated, aperture-matched DustPedia photometry and the fitting code CIGALE. The value of f_abs is obtained from the total luminosity emitted by dust and from the bolometric luminosity, which are estimated by the fit. On average, 19% of the stellar radiation is absorbed by dust in DustPedia galaxies. The fraction rises to 25% if only late-type galaxies are considered. The dependence of f_abs on morphology, showing a peak for Sb-Sc galaxies, is weak;…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
