Relative Importance of Convective Uncertainties
Etienne A. Kaiser (1), Raphael Hirschi ((1), (2)), W. David Arnett, (3), Andrea Cristini (4), Cyril Georgy (5), Laura J. A. Scott (1) ((1), Keele University, UK, (2) University of Tokyo, Japan, (3) University of, Arizona, USA, (4) University of Oklahoma, USA

TL;DR
This paper investigates how different treatments of convection boundaries and mixing in stellar models affect the early evolution of massive stars, highlighting the convergence of models and changes in stellar evolution outcomes.
Contribution
It compares two key convective uncertainties in stellar models and shows how their variation influences stellar evolution predictions.
Findings
Convergence of boundary location with increased mixing.
Decreased blue to red supergiant ratio.
Reduced significance of semiconvection.
Abstract
Convection plays a key role in the evolution of stars due to energy transport and mixing of composition. Despite its importance, this process is still not well understood. One longstanding conundrum in all 1D stellar evolution codes is the treatment of convective boundaries. In this study we compare two convective uncertainties, the boundary location (Ledoux versus Schwarzschild) and the amount of extra mixing, and their impact on the early evolution of massive stars. With increasing convective boundary mixing (CBM), we find a convergence of the two different boundary locations, a decreasing blue to red super giant ratio and a reduced importance of semiconvection.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
