Implementing the Lexicographic Maxmin Bargaining Solution
Ashish Goel, Anilesh K. Krishnaswamy

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel mechanism that successfully implements the lexicographic maxmin bargaining solution as the unique subgame perfect equilibrium in an n-player setting, filling a notable gap in bargaining theory.
Contribution
The paper constructs the first known mechanism for implementing the lexicographic maxmin solution, using a binary game tree and novel combinatorial properties.
Findings
Mechanism achieves unique subgame perfect equilibrium outcome.
Characterizes key combinatorial properties of the lexicographic maxmin solution.
Fills a gap in implementation of bargaining solutions.
Abstract
There has been much work on exhibiting mechanisms that implement various bargaining solutions, in particular, the Kalai-Smorodinsky solution \cite{moulin1984implementing} and the Nash Bargaining solution. Another well-known and axiomatically well-studied solution is the lexicographic maxmin solution. However, there is no mechanism known for its implementation. To fill this gap, we construct a mechanism that implements the lexicographic maxmin solution as the unique subgame perfect equilibrium outcome in the n-player setting. As is standard in the literature on implementation of bargaining solutions, we use the assumption that any player can grab the entire surplus. Our mechanism consists of a binary game tree, with each node corresponding to a subgame where the players are allowed to choose between two outcomes. We characterize novel combinatorial properties of the lexicographic maxmin…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Game Theory and Applications · Auction Theory and Applications
