Exploring the Performance Boundaries of NB-IoT

TL;DR

This paper empirically evaluates NB-IoT's performance, focusing on energy, reliability, and delays, revealing strengths in energy efficiency and delivery guarantees but also high variability that may limit certain applications.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive analysis of NB-IoT's performance boundaries, highlighting its advantages and limitations compared to other LPWAN technologies.

Findings

Energy consumption is comparable or better than LoRa.

NB-IoT guarantees message delivery.

High variability in energy use and delays.

Abstract

NarrowBand-IoT has just joined the LPWAN community. Unlike most of its competitors, NB-IoT did not emerge from a blank slate. Indeed, it is closely linked to LTE, from which it inherits many of the features that undoubtedly determine its behavior. In this paper, we empirically explore the boundaries of this technology, analyzing from a user's point of view critical characteristics such as energy consumption, reliability and delays. The results show that its performance in terms of energy is comparable and even outperforms, in some cases, an LPWAN reference technology like LoRa, with the added benefit of guaranteeing delivery. However, the high variability observed in both energy expenditure and network delays call into question its suitability for some applications, especially those subject to service-level agreements.