Local disc model in view of Gaia DR1 and RAVE data
K. Sysoliatina (1), A. Just (1), I. Koutsouridou (2), E.K. Grebel (1),, G. Kordopatis (8), M. Steinmetz (10), O. Bienaym\'e (9), B.K. Gibson (3), J., Navarro (7), W. Reid (5,6), and G. Seabroke (4) ((1) Astronomisches, Rechen-Institut, Heidelberg, Germany

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the semi-analytic JJ disc model against Gaia DR1 and RAVE data, demonstrating its ability to accurately reproduce vertical stellar population properties in the solar neighborhood.
Contribution
It provides a detailed validation of the JJ model using Gaia DR1 and RAVE data, confirming its effectiveness for modeling the Milky Way's thin disc.
Findings
Good agreement between simulated and observed vertical density profiles
Successful reproduction of velocity distribution functions
Model can serve as a baseline for further Galactic studies
Abstract
We test the performance of the semi-analytic self-consistent Just-Jahrei{\ss} disc model (JJ model) with the astrometric data from the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric Solution (TGAS) sub-catalogue of the first Gaia data release (Gaia DR1), as well as the radial velocities from the fifth data release of the Radial Velocity Experiment survey (RAVE DR5). We use a sample of 19,746 thin disc stars from the TGASRAVE cross-match selected in the local solar cylinder of 300 pc radius and 1 kpc height below the Galactic plane and simulate this sample via the forward modelling technique. First, we convert the predicted vertical density laws of the thin disc populations into a mock sample. Then the obtained mock populations are reddened with a 3D dust map and are subjected to the selection criteria corresponding to the RAVE and TGAS observational limitations as well as to additional cuts applied to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
