Modelling Errors in X-ray Fluoroscopic Imaging Systems Using Photogrammetric Bundle Adjustment With a Data-Driven Self-Calibration Approach
Jacky C.K. Chow, Derek Lichti, Kathleen Ang, Gregor Kuntze, Gulshan, Sharma, and Janet Ronsky

TL;DR
This study presents a data-driven, self-calibrating photogrammetric bundle adjustment method to model and correct systematic errors in fluoroscopic X-ray imaging systems, achieving high 3D reconstruction accuracy with minimal images.
Contribution
It introduces a novel self-tuning approach for modeling complex non-linear distortions in fluoroscopic X-ray systems without expert parametric models.
Findings
Achieved 0.06 mm to 0.09 mm 3D reconstruction accuracy post-calibration.
Spatial resection RMSE between 3.10 mm and 3.31 mm.
Effective calibration with only 15 X-ray images.
Abstract
X-ray imaging is a fundamental tool of routine clinical diagnosis. Fluoroscopic imaging can further acquire X-ray images at video frame rates, thus enabling non-invasive in-vivo motion studies of joints, gastrointestinal tract, etc. For both the qualitative and quantitative analysis of static and dynamic X-ray images, the data should be free of systematic biases. Besides precise fabrication of hardware, software-based calibration solutions are commonly used for modelling the distortions. In this primary research study, a robust photogrammetric bundle adjustment was used to model the projective geometry of two fluoroscopic X-ray imaging systems. However, instead of relying on an expert photogrammetrist's knowledge and judgement to decide on a parametric model for describing the systematic errors, a self-tuning data-driven approach is used to model the complex non-linear distortion…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
