Proof of the Kalai-Meshulam conjecture
Maria Chudnovsky, Alex Scott, Paul Seymour, Sophie Spirkl

TL;DR
This paper proves the Kalai-Meshulam conjecture, establishing that for graphs with no induced cycles of length divisible by three, the sum over stable sets of (-1) to the size of the set is at most 1 in absolute value.
Contribution
The paper provides a proof of the Kalai-Meshulam conjecture, linking topological properties of graphs to combinatorial invariants.
Findings
Confirmed the conjecture that |f_G| ≤ 1 for graphs without induced cycles of length divisible by three.
Established the value of f_G as ±2 for cycles with length divisible by three.
Connected topological considerations with combinatorial graph properties.
Abstract
Let be a graph, and let be the sum of , over all stable sets . If is a cycle with length divisible by three, then . Motivated by topological considerations, G. Kalai and R. Meshulam made the conjecture that,if no induced cycle of a graph has length divisible by three, then . We prove this conjecture.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
