High-resolution (p,t) reaction measurements as spectroscopic tests of {\it ab-initio} theory in the mid $pf$-shell
K.G. Leach, J.D. Holt, P.E. Garrett, S.R. Stroberg, G.C. Ball, P.C., Bender, V. Bildstein, A. Diaz Varela, R. Dunlop, T. Faestermann, B. Hadinia,, R. Hertenberger, D.S. Jamieson, B. Jigmeddorj, R. Kr\"ucken, A.T. Laffoley,, A.J. Radich, E.T. Rand, C.E. Svensson, S. Triambak

TL;DR
This study combines high-resolution (p,t) transfer reaction measurements with advanced ab-initio shell-model calculations to test and benchmark nuclear structure theories in the mid pf-shell, focusing on excited states in $^{50}$Cr and $^{62}$Zn.
Contribution
It provides detailed experimental data and compares it with cutting-edge ab-initio calculations, demonstrating good agreement and advancing nuclear structure modeling.
Findings
Good agreement in level ordering between experiment and theory
Slight over-binding observed in theoretical calculations
Identification of several previously unobserved states
Abstract
Detailed spectroscopic measurements of excited states in Cr and Zn were performed using 24~MeV (p,t) transfer reactions on Cr and Zn, respectively. In total, forty-five states in Cr and sixty-seven states in Zn were observed up to excitation energies of 5.5~MeV, including several previously unobserved states. These experimental results are compared to {\it ab-initio} shell-model calculations using chiral effective field theory (-EFT) with the valence-space in-medium similarity renormalization group (VS-IMSRG) method. This comparison demonstrates good agreement in the level orderings with these new theoretical methods, albeit with a slight over binding in the calculations. This work is part of a continued push to benchmark {\it ab-initio} theoretical techniques to nuclear structure data in superallowed Fermi …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
