Heegaard Floer invariants of contact structures on links of surface singularities
J\'ozsef Bodn\'ar, Olga Plamenevskaya

TL;DR
This paper proves that the Heegaard Floer invariant of canonical contact structures on links of surface singularities has a unique property, not lying in the U-action image, contrasting with general fillable structures.
Contribution
It establishes a special property of Heegaard Floer invariants for canonical contact structures on surface singularity links, linking Floer homology with lattice cohomology.
Findings
Heegaard Floer invariant $c^+(\xi_0)$ does not lie in the U-action image.
Karakurt's U-tower height invariants are always zero for these structures.
Contrasts with arbitrary U-tower heights in general fillable contact structures.
Abstract
Let a contact 3-manifold be the link of a normal surface singularity equipped with its canonical contact structure . We prove a special property of such contact 3-manifolds of "algebraic" origin: the Heegaard Floer invariant cannot lie in the image of the -action on . It follows that Karakurt's "height of -tower" invariants are always 0 for canonical contact structures on singularity links, which contrasts the fact that the height of -tower can be arbitrary for general fillable contact structures. Our proof uses the interplay between the Heegaard Floer homology and N\'emethi's lattice cohomology.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
