Characterization and Performance of PADME's Cherenkov-Based Small-Angle Calorimeter
A. Frankenthal, J. Alexander, B. Buonomo, E. Capitolo, C. Capoccia, C., Cesarotti, R. De Sangro, C. Di Giulio, F. Ferrarotto, L. Foggetta, G., Georgiev, P. Gianotti, M. Hunyadi, V. Kozhuharov, A. Krasznahorkay, E., Leonardi, G. Organtini, G. Piperno, M. Raggi, C. Rella

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the performance of PADME's Cherenkov-based Small-Angle Calorimeter, demonstrating excellent timing and energy resolution crucial for detecting dark photon decays in a particle physics experiment.
Contribution
It provides detailed measurement and simulation results of the calorimeter's timing and energy resolution, and proposes a novel two-PMT configuration for enhanced performance.
Findings
Timing resolution of 81 ps achieved
Energy resolution of 5.7%/$\sqrt{E}$ with 2.07 photo-electrons/MeV
Potential for improved high-energy detection with two-PMT design
Abstract
The PADME experiment, at the Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati (LNF), in Italy, will search for invisible decays of the hypothetical dark photon via the process , where the escapes detection. The dark photon mass range sensitivity in a first phase will be 1 to 24 MeV. We report here on measurement and simulation studies of the performance of the Small-Angle Calorimeter, a component of PADME's detector dedicated to rejecting 2- and 3-gamma backgrounds. The crucial requirement is a timing resolution of less than 200 ps, which is satisfied by the choice of PbF crystals and the newly released Hamamatsu R13478UV photomultiplier tubes (PMTs). We find a timing resolution of 81 ps (with double-peak separation resolution of 1.8 ns) and a single-crystal energy resolution of 5.7%/ with light yield of 2.07 photo-electrons per MeV, using 100 to 400 MeV…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
