Kinetic simulations of mildly relativistic shocks I: particle acceleration in high Mach number shocks
Patrick Crumley, Damiano Caprioli, Sera Markoff, and Anatoly, Spitkovsky

TL;DR
This study uses large-scale kinetic simulations to explore particle acceleration mechanisms in mildly relativistic shocks, revealing differences between quasi-parallel and quasi-perpendicular configurations and implications for cosmic ray sources.
Contribution
It provides new insights into particle acceleration and magnetic turbulence in high Mach number, mildly relativistic shocks using unprecedented simulation scales.
Findings
Quasi-parallel shocks produce non-thermal power-law distributions for electrons and ions.
Upstream heating of electrons is minimal, with ions and electrons near thermal equilibrium at the shock front.
Approximately 10% of shock energy converts into non-thermal protons and magnetic fields.
Abstract
We use fully kinetic particle-in-cell simulations with unprecedentedly large transverse box sizes to study particle acceleration in weakly-magnetized mildly relativistic shocks traveling at a velocity and a Mach number of 15. We examine both subluminal (quasi-parallel) and superluminal (quasi-perpendicular) magnetic field orientations. We find that quasi-parallel shocks are mediated by a filamentary non-resonant (Bell) instability driven by non-thermal ions, producing magnetic fluctuations on scales comparable to the ion gyro-radius. In quasi-parallel shocks, both electrons and ions are accelerated into non-thermal power-laws whose maximum energy grows linearly with time. The upstream heating of electrons is small, and the two species enter the shock front in rough thermal equilibrium. The shock's structure is complex; the current of reflected non-thermal ions evacuates…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
