Theories of truth for countable languages which conform to classical logic
Seppo Heikkil\"a

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that any countable classical logic language can be extended to include a definitional and semantical truth theory, integrating truth and non-truth predicates with equivalence under meaning-based valuation.
Contribution
It introduces a method to extend countable classical languages with comprehensive truth theories that include both truth and non-truth predicates, ensuring semantic valuation.
Findings
Existence of extensions with definitional truth theories
Extensions can have a semantic truth theory based on meaning valuation
Truth and non-truth predicates coexist in the theories
Abstract
Every countable language which conforms to classical logic is shown to have an extension which conforms to classical logic, and has a definitional theory of truth. That extension has a semantical theory of truth, if every sentence of the object language is valuated by its meaning either as true or as false. These theories contain both a truth predicate and a non-truth predicate. Theories are equivalent when the sentences of the object language are valuated by their meanings.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhilosophy and Theoretical Science · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Advanced Algebra and Logic
