Evading the Trans-Planckian problem with Vaidya spacetimes
Ivan Booth (University of Newfoundland), Bradley Creelman (University, of Newfoundland), Jessica Santiago (Victoria University of Wellington), and, Matt Visser (Victoria University of Wellington)

TL;DR
This paper proposes a kinematic model using Vaidya spacetimes to address the trans-Planckian problem in Hawking radiation, suggesting that Hawking photons originate outside the horizon rather than from near it.
Contribution
It introduces a purely kinematical Vaidya spacetime model to better understand Hawking evaporation and the trans-Planckian issue, focusing on the shell's acceleration and its relation to Unruh temperature.
Findings
Explicit calculation of shell's 4-acceleration including gravity and flux effects
Relation between shell acceleration and Unruh temperature established
Model suggests Hawking photons originate outside the horizon
Abstract
Hawking radiation, when treated in the ray optics limit, exhibits the unfortunate trans-Planckian problem --- a Hawking photon near spatial infinity, if back-tracked to the immediate vicinity of the horizon is hugely blue-shifted and found to have had trans-Planckian energy. (And if back-tracked all the way to the horizon, the photon is formally infinitely blue-shifted, and formally acquires infinite energy.) Unruh has forcefully argued that this implies that the Hawking flux represents a vacuum instability in the presence of a horizon, and that the Hawking photons are actually emitted from some region exterior to the horizon. We seek to make this idea more precise and somewhat explicit by building a purely kinematical model for Hawking evaporation based on two Vaidya spacetimes (outer and inner) joined across a thin time-like boundary layer. The kinematics of this model is already…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
