Computational Courtship: Understanding the Evolution of Online Dating through Large-scale Data Analysis
Rachel Dinh, Patrick Gildersleve, Chris Blex, Taha Yasseri

TL;DR
This study analyzes a decade of online dating data from eHarmony to understand evolving gender preferences, communication patterns, and inequalities, revealing insights into how digital courtship influences social norms and relationships.
Contribution
It provides a unique longitudinal analysis of user behavior, preferences, and inequalities in online dating, connecting empirical findings to societal change theories.
Findings
Profile similarity does not predict success, except for children and smoking habits.
Gender differences in preferences and communication have evolved over time.
Online dating practices show persistent or changing inequalities between genders.
Abstract
Have we become more tolerant of dating people of different social backgrounds compared to ten years ago? Has the rise of online dating exacerbated or alleviated gender inequalities in modern courtship? Are the most attractive people on these platforms necessarily the most successful? In this work, we examine the mate preferences and communication patterns of male and female users of the online dating site eHarmony over the past decade to identify how attitudes and behaviors have changed over this time period. While other studies have investigated disparities in user behavior between male and female users, this study is unique in its longitudinal approach. Specifically, we analyze how men and women differ in their preferences for certain traits in potential partners and how those preferences have changed over time. The second line of inquiry investigates to what extent physical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
