A possible advantage of telescopes with a non-circular pupil
Guy Nir, Barak Zackay, Eran O. Ofek

TL;DR
This paper shows that telescopes with elongated, non-circular pupils can achieve better contrast at lower separations from bright stars, improving faint companion detection compared to traditional circular pupils.
Contribution
The study demonstrates through simulations and observations that elongated-pupil telescopes offer superior contrast at small angular separations, with robustness to measurement errors and practical rotation strategies.
Findings
Elongated pupils improve contrast at lower separations.
Simulations and real observations confirm the advantage.
Robustness to point spread function measurement errors.
Abstract
Most telescope designs have a circular-shape aperture. We demonstrate that telescopes with an elongated pupil have better contrast, at lower separations, between a bright central star and a faint companion. We simulate images for an elongated-pupil telescope and for a circular-pupil telescope of equal aperture area and integration time, investigating specifically what is the maximal contrast for finding faint companions around bright stars as a function of angular separation. We show that this design gives better contrast at lower separation from a bright star. This is shown for diffraction-limited (for perfect and imperfect optics) and seeing-limited speckle images, assuming equal aperture area and observing time. We also show the results are robust to errors in measurement of the point spread function. To compensate for the wider point spread function of the short axis, images should…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
