Alleviating the inconsistencies in modelling decay of fissile compound nuclei
Tathagata Banerjee, S. Nath, and Santanu Pal

TL;DR
This paper enhances the modeling of fissile compound nucleus decay by incorporating key physical effects and systematically comparing with extensive experimental data, reducing previous inconsistencies in predictions.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive model including shell effects, dissipation, and collective enhancements, with minimal parameter tuning, to better match experimental decay data across a wide mass range.
Findings
Reasonable fits to evaporation residue and fission cross sections.
Underestimation of pre-scission neutron multiplicities beyond ACN~200.
Qualitative agreement in proton and alpha-particle multiplicities.
Abstract
This work attempts to overcome the existing inconsistencies in modelling decay of fissile nucleus by inclusion of important physical effects in the model and through a systematic analysis of a large set of data over a wide range of CN mass (ACN). The model includes shell effect in the level density (LD) parameter, shell correction in the fission barrier, effect of the orientation degree of freedom of the CN spin (Kor), collective enhancement of level density (CELD) and dissipation in fission. Input parameters are not tuned to reproduce observables from specific reaction(s) and the reduced dissipation coefficient is treated as the only adjustable parameter. Calculated evaporation residue (ER) cross sections, fission cross sections and particle, i.e. neutron, proton and alpha-particle, multiplicities are compared with data covering ACN = 156-248. The model produces reasonable fits to ER…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
