Boosting Linear-Optical Bell Measurement Success Probability with Pre-Detection Squeezing and Imperfect Photon-Number-Resolving Detectors
Thomas Kilmer, Saikat Guha

TL;DR
This paper investigates how pre-detection squeezing can enhance the success probability of linear-optical Bell state measurements beyond 50%, identifying optimal squeezing parameters and exploring trade-offs with error probabilities for improved quantum communication.
Contribution
It provides new insights into squeezing-enhanced Bell measurement success probabilities, correcting previous overestimations, and explores a trade-off between success and error probabilities for quantum repeater applications.
Findings
Maximum success probability with squeezing is approximately 0.596 at optimal squeezing.
The previously reported success probability of 0.643 is experimentally unachievable.
Trade-off analysis suggests potential for higher entanglement rates with acceptable error levels.
Abstract
Linear optical realizations of Bell state measurement (BSM) on two single-photon qubits succeed with probability no higher than . However pre-detection quadrature squeezing, i.e., quantum noise limited phase sensitive amplification, in the usual linear-optical BSM circuit, can yield . The ability to achieve has been found to be critical in resource-efficient realizations of linear optical quantum computing and all-photonic quantum repeaters. Yet, the aforesaid value of is not known to be the maximum achievable using squeezing, thereby leaving it open whether close-to- efficient BSM might be achievable using squeezing as a resource. In this paper, we report new insights on why squeezing-enhanced BSM achieves . Using this, we show that the previously-reported at single-mode squeezing strength…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
