Validation and Uncertainty Quantification for Wall Boiling Closure Relations in Multiphase-CFD Solver

TL;DR

This paper performs validation and uncertainty quantification of wall boiling closure relations in a multiphase CFD solver, assessing their accuracy and consistency using statistical methods and datasets.

Contribution

It introduces a comprehensive VUQ framework for wall boiling closure relations, combining sensitivity analysis, Bayesian inference, and validation metrics.

Findings

Closure relations show satisfactory superheat prediction accuracy.

Intrinsic inconsistencies limit prediction accuracy across all quantities.

Statistical methods identify influential parameters and quantify uncertainties.

Abstract

The two-fluid model based Multiphase Computational Fluid Dynamics (MCFD) has been considered as one of the most promising tools to investigate two-phase flow and boiling system for engineering purposes. The MCFD solver requires closure relations to make the conservation equations solvable. The wall boiling closure relations, for example, provide predictions on wall superheat and heat partitioning. The accuracy of these closure relations significantly influences the predictive capability of the solver. In this paper, a study of validation and uncertainty quantification (VUQ) for the wall boiling closure relations in MCFD solver is performed. The work has three purposes: i). identify influential parameters to the quantities of interest of the boiling system through sensitivity analysis; ii). evaluate the parameter uncertainty through Bayesian inference with the support of multiple datasets; iii). quantitatively measure the agreement between solver predictions and datasets. The widely used Kurul-Podowski wall boiling closure relation is studied in this paper. Several statistical methods are used, including Morris screening method for global sensitivity analysis, Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) for inverse Bayesian inference, and confidence interval as the validation metric. The VUQ results indicated that the current empirical correlations-based wall boiling closure relations achieved satisfactory agreement on wall superheat predictions. However, the closure relations also demonstrate intrinsic inconsistency and fail to give consistently accurate predictions for all quantities of interest over the well-developed nucleate boiling regime.