A Detailed Study of the Most Relaxed SPT-Selected Galaxy Clusters: Cool Core and Central Galaxy Properties
M. McDonald, S. W. Allen, J. Hlavacek-Larrondo, A. B. Mantz, M., Bayliss, B. A. Benson, M. Brodwin, E. Bulbul, R. E. A. Canning, I. Chiu, W., R. Forman, G. P. Garmire, N. Gupta, G. Khullar, J. J. Mohr, C. L. Reichardt,, T. Schrabback

TL;DR
This study analyzes four relaxed galaxy clusters at intermediate redshift using multi-wavelength data, revealing that their intracluster medium properties and metallicity profiles are similar to local clusters, indicating early establishment of core features and regulated cooling over billions of years.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of relaxed clusters at z~0.6 with local counterparts, showing preserved self-similarity and early enrichment in cluster cores.
Findings
ICM temperature, density, and entropy profiles are similar to local clusters.
Metallicity profiles show early enrichment, with central excess similar to z~0 clusters.
Diverse star formation rates in central galaxies despite similar cooling properties.
Abstract
We present a multi-wavelength analysis of the four most relaxed clusters in the South Pole Telescope 2500 deg^2 survey, which lie at 0.55 < z < 0.75. This study, which utilizes new, deep data from Chandra and Hubble, along with ground-based spectroscopy from Gemini and Magellan, improves significantly on previous studies in both depth and angular resolution, allowing us to directly compare to clusters at z~0. We find that the temperature, density, and entropy profiles of the intracluster medium (ICM) are very similar among the four clusters, and share similar shapes to clusters at z~0. Specifically, we find no evidence for deviations from self similarity in the temperature profile over the radial range 10kpc < r < 1Mpc, implying that the processes responsible for preventing runaway cooling over the past >6 Gyr are, at least roughly, preserving self similarity. We find typical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
