Primitive and geometric-progression-free sets without large gaps
Nathan McNew

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates the existence of primitive and geometric-progression-free sets with smaller gaps than prime numbers, using probabilistic methods to improve known bounds.
Contribution
It introduces new probabilistic constructions that establish smaller gap bounds in primitive and geometric-progression-free sets compared to previous results.
Findings
Primitive sets with smaller gaps than primes
Improved bounds for geometric-progression-free sets
Probabilistic methods effectively establish new gap bounds
Abstract
We prove the existence of primitive sets (sets of integers in which no element divides another) in which the gap between any two consecutive terms is substantially smaller than the best known upper bound for the gaps in the sequence of prime numbers. The proof uses the probabilistic method. Using the same techniques we improve the bounds obtained by He for gaps in geometric-progression-free sets.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
