Comment on Tamagawa & Ikeda's reinterpretation of the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz equation. Are transmembrane potentials caused by polarization?
Thomas Heimburg

TL;DR
This paper discusses the controversy surrounding Tamagawa & Ikeda's reinterpretation of the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz equation and explores whether transmembrane potentials are caused by polarization.
Contribution
It critically examines the recent challenge to the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz equation and its implications for understanding membrane potentials.
Findings
Reevaluation of the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz equation
Discussion on the role of polarization in membrane potentials
Implications for biomembrane function models
Abstract
The emergence of electrical fields across biological membranes is central to our present understanding of biomembrane function. The most prominent example is the textbook model for the action potential that relies on transmembrane voltage and membrane permeability. In a recent article by Tamagawa & Ikeda , an important underlying concept, the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz equation, has been challenged (Tamagawa & Ikeda. 2018, Eur. Biophys. J. doi: 10.1007/s00249-018-1332-0}. This will be discussed below.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
