The WAGGS project - II. The reliability of the calcium triplet as a metallicity indicator in integrated stellar light
Christopher Usher, Thomas Beckwith, Sabine Bellstedt, Adebusola Alabi,, Leonie Chevalier, Nicola Pastorello, Pierluigi Cerulo, Hannah S. Dalgleish,, Amelia Fraser-McKelvie, Sebastian Kamann, Samantha Penny, Caroline Foster,, Richard McDermid, Ricardo P. Schiavon, Alexa Villaume

TL;DR
This study evaluates the calcium triplet's effectiveness as a metallicity indicator in integrated stellar light, demonstrating its reliability for older populations and its sensitivity to stellar mass function at low metallicities.
Contribution
It provides empirical calibrations of the calcium triplet index with [Fe/H] and [Ca/H], highlighting its reliability for populations older than 3 Gyr and analyzing its sensitivity to various stellar parameters.
Findings
CaT correlates more tightly with [Ca/H] than [Fe/H].
CaT reliably measures [Ca/H] for populations older than 3 Gyr.
CaT sensitivity varies with age, metallicity, and stellar mass function.
Abstract
Using data from the WiFeS Atlas of Galactic Globular cluster Spectra we study the behaviour of the calcium triplet (CaT), a popular metallicity indicator in extragalactic stellar population studies. A major caveat of these studies is that the potential sensitivity to other stellar population parameters such as age, calcium abundance and the initial mass function has not yet been empirically evaluated. Here we present measurements of the strength of the CaT feature for 113 globular clusters in the Milky Way and its satellite galaxies. We derive empirical calibrations between the CaT index and both the iron abundance ([Fe/H]) and calcium abundance ([Ca/H]), finding a tighter relationship for [Ca/H] than for [Fe/H]. For stellar populations 3 Gyr and older the CaT can be used to reliably measure [Ca/H] at the 0.1 dex level but becomes less reliable for ages of Gyr and younger. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
