Evaluating MCC-PHAT for the LOCATA Challenge - Task 1 and Task 3
Shoufeng Lin

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the MCC-PHAT sound source localization method on the LOCATA Challenge tasks, showing it generally outperforms the MUSIC method in accuracy and reliability for static and moving speakers.
Contribution
The study applies MCC-PHAT to LOCATA tasks and compares its performance with MUSIC, demonstrating improved localization accuracy and robustness.
Findings
MCC-PHAT outperforms MUSIC in most localization scenarios.
MCC-PHAT provides more reliable and accurate source estimates.
Evaluation uses OSPA metric for quantitative comparison.
Abstract
This report presents test results for the \mbox{LOCATA} challenge \cite{lollmann2018locata} using the recently developed MCC-PHAT (multichannel cross correlation - phase transform) sound source localization method. The specific tasks addressed are respectively the localization of a single static and a single moving speakers using sound recordings of a variety of static microphone arrays. The test results are compared with those of the MUSIC (multiple signal classification) method. The optimal subpattern assignment (OSPA) metric is used for quantitative performance evaluation. In most cases, the MCC-PHAT method demonstrates more reliable and accurate location estimates, in comparison with those of the MUSIC method.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpeech and Audio Processing · Music and Audio Processing · Speech Recognition and Synthesis
