A geometrical 1% distance to the short-period binary Cepheid V1334 Cygni
A. Gallenne, P. Kervella, N. R. Evans, C.R Proffitt, J. D. Monnier, A., Merand, E. Nelan, E. Winston, G. Pietrzynski, G. Schaefer, W. Gieren, R. I., Anderson, S. Borgniet, S. Kraus, R. M. Roettenbacher, F. Baron, B. Pilecki,, M. Taormina, D. Graczyk, N. Mowlavi, L. Eyer

TL;DR
This study precisely measures the distance to the binary Cepheid V1334 Cyg, revealing the impact of binarity on the Period-Luminosity relation and providing highly accurate stellar masses, which enhances calibration of cosmic distance scales.
Contribution
The paper presents the most accurate geometric distance to a Cepheid using interferometry and spectroscopy, and highlights the significance of binarity in calibrating the Period-Luminosity relation.
Findings
Distance to V1334 Cyg is 720.35 +/- 7.84 pc with 1% accuracy.
Binarity significantly affects the star's integrated magnitude, especially in visible wavelengths.
Dynamical masses of the components are precisely determined: 4.288 and 4.040 solar masses.
Abstract
Cepheid stars play a considerable role as extragalactic distances indicators, thanks to the simple empirical relation between their pulsation period and their luminosity. They overlap with that of secondary distance indicators, such as Type Ia supernovae, whose distance scale is tied to Cepheid luminosities. However, the Period-Luminosity (P-L) relation still lacks a calibration to better than 5%. Using an original combination of interferometric astrometry with optical and ultraviolet spectroscopy, we measured the geometrical distance d = 720.35+/-7.84 pc of the 3.33 d period Cepheid V1334 Cyg with an unprecedented accuracy of +/-1 %, providing the most accurate distance for a Cepheid. Placing this star in the P-L diagram provides an independent test of existing period-luminosity relations. We show that the secondary star has a significant impact on the integrated magnitude,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
