Dependence of alpha-particle-driven Alfv\'en eigenmode linear stability on device magnetic field strength and consequences for next-generation tokamaks
E. A. Tolman, N. F. Loureiro, P. Rodrigues, J. W. Hughes, E. S. Marmar

TL;DR
This study analyzes how increasing magnetic field strength in tokamaks affects Alfvén eigenmode stability, revealing potential advantages for next-generation high-field devices in reducing instability growth rates.
Contribution
It provides analytical and numerical insights into the dependence of AE stability on magnetic field strength, highlighting how high-field tokamaks may mitigate alpha-driven instabilities.
Findings
High magnetic fields can suppress AE resonances by making fusion alphas sub-Alfvénic.
Higher magnetic fields lead to higher toroidal mode numbers for unstable modes.
High-field devices may have advantageous AE stability properties at various densities.
Abstract
Recently-proposed tokamak concepts use magnetic fields up to 12 T, far higher than in conventional devices, to reduce size and cost. Theoretical and computational study of trends in plasma behavior with increasing field strength is critical to such proposed devices. This paper considers trends in Alfv\'en eigenmode (AE) stability. Energetic particles, including alphas from D-T fusion, can destabilize AEs, possibly causing loss of alpha heat and damage to the device. AEs are sensitive to device magnetic field via the field dependence of resonances, alpha particle beta, and alpha orbit width. We describe the origin and effect of these dependences analytically and by using recently-developed numerical techniques (Rodrigues et al. 2015 Nucl. Fusion 55 083003). The work suggests high-field machines where fusion-born alphas are sub-Alfv\'enic or nearly sub-Alfv\'enic may partially cut off AE…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
