Geometrically incompatible confinement of solids
Benny Davidovitch, Yiwei Sun, Gregory M. Grason

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new theoretical principle called the Gauss-Euler elastica, explaining how thin solids confined to incompatible geometries can store minimal strain energy despite geometric constraints, simplifying complex mechanical analyses.
Contribution
It generalizes Euler's elastica to include incompatible confinement, providing a new framework for understanding the mechanics of thin solids under complex geometric constraints.
Findings
The ratio of strain to bending energy can be arbitrarily small in incompatible confinement.
Numerical and analytical results demonstrate the validity of the Gauss-Euler elastica.
The framework simplifies solving nonlinear equilibrium equations for thin solids.
Abstract
The complex morphologies exhibited by spatially confined thin objects have long challenged human efforts to understand and manipulate them, from the representation of patterns in draped fabric in Renaissance art to current day efforts to engineer flexible sensors that conform to the human body. We introduce a theoretical principle, broadly generalizing Euler's {\emph{elastica}} -- a core concept of continuum mechanics that invokes the energetic preference of bending over straining a thin solid object and has been widely applied to classical and modern studies of beams and rods. We define a class of {\emph{geometrically incompatible confinement}} problems, whereby the topography imposed on a thin solid body is incompatible with its intrinsic ("target") metric and, as a consequence of Gauss' {\emph{Theorema Egregium}}, induces strain. Focusing on a prototypical example of a sheet attached…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
