Benchmarking five global optimization approaches for nano-optical shape optimization and parameter reconstruction
Philipp-Immanuel Schneider, Xavier Garcia Santiago, Victor Soltwisch,, Martin Hammerschmidt, Sven Burger, Carsten Rockstuhl

TL;DR
This paper benchmarks five global optimization methods on nano-optical design problems, demonstrating Bayesian optimization's superior performance in accuracy and efficiency compared to traditional methods.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of optimization techniques for nano-optics, highlighting Bayesian optimization's advantages in speed and results quality.
Findings
Bayesian optimization outperforms other methods in accuracy.
Bayesian optimization requires less computational time.
Traditional methods are less efficient for complex nano-optical problems.
Abstract
Numerical optimization is an important tool in the field of computational physics in general and in nano-optics in specific. It has attracted attention with the increase in complexity of structures that can be realized with nowadays nano-fabrication technologies for which a rational design is no longer feasible. Also, numerical resources are available to enable the computational photonic material design and to identify structures that meet predefined optical properties for specific applications. However, the optimization objective function is in general non-convex and its computation remains resource demanding such that the right choice for the optimization method is crucial to obtain excellent results. Here, we benchmark five global optimization methods for three typical nano-optical optimization problems: \removed{downhill simplex optimization, the limited-memory…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
