On uplifts by warped anti-D3-branes
Jakob Moritz, Ander Retolaza, Alexander Westphal

TL;DR
This paper critiques the ten-dimensional consistency of KKLT de Sitter vacua, arguing against recent claims and discussing supergravity parametrizations, highlighting ongoing debates in string theory compactifications.
Contribution
It provides a detailed argument against the ten-dimensional consistency of KKLT de Sitter vacua and addresses recent criticisms, clarifying theoretical disagreements.
Findings
Arguments against ten-dimensional consistency of KKLT vacua
Disagreement with recent criticisms of KKLT models
Discussion on supergravity parametrization proposals
Abstract
In this note we outline the arguments against the ten-dimensional consistency of the simplest types of KKLT de Sitter vacua, as given in arXiv:1707.08678. We comment on parametrization proposals within four-dimensional supergravity and express our disagreement with the recent criticism by the authors of arXiv:1808.09428.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
