The delay of shock breakout due to circumstellar material seen in most Type II Supernovae
F. F\"orster, T.J. Moriya, J.C. Maureira, J.P. Anderson, S. Blinnikov,, F. Bufano, G. Cabrera-Vives, A. Clocchiatti, Th. de Jaeger, P.A. Est\'evez,, L. Galbany, S. Gonz\'alez-Gait\'an, G. Gr\"afener, M. Hamuy, E. Hsiao, P., Huentelemu, P. Huijse, H. Kuncarayakti

TL;DR
This study analyzes early light curves of Type II supernovae, revealing that shock breakout signals are often delayed due to dense circumstellar material, challenging previous expectations of their brief, hour-long signatures.
Contribution
It provides the first systematic observational evidence that shock breakouts in Type II SNe are frequently delayed by circumstellar matter, supported by hydrodynamical modeling.
Findings
Most SNe II show a steep rise over a few days, indicating delayed shock breakout signatures.
Dense circumstellar material with high mass loss rates is common around these supergiant stars.
The typical hour-long shock breakout signature may be rare, with delays caused by circumstellar interactions.
Abstract
Type II supernovae (SNe) originate from the explosion of hydrogen-rich supergiant massive stars. Their first electromagnetic signature is the shock breakout, a short-lived phenomenon which can last from hours to days depending on the density at shock emergence. We present 26 rising optical light curves of SN II candidates discovered shortly after explosion by the High cadence Transient Survey (HiTS) and derive physical parameters based on hydrodynamical models using a Bayesian approach. We observe a steep rise of a few days in 24 out of 26 SN II candidates, indicating the systematic detection of shock breakouts in a dense circumstellar matter consistent with a mass loss rate or a dense atmosphere. This implies that the characteristic hour timescale signature of stellar envelope SBOs may be rare in nature and could be delayed into longer-lived…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
