Contribution to the discussion of "When should meta-analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?": A Bayesian perspective
Christian R\"over, Tim Friede

TL;DR
This paper offers a Bayesian perspective on when meta-analysis should avoid assuming hidden normality, providing insights into the conditions and implications of such assumptions in statistical synthesis.
Contribution
It introduces a Bayesian framework to evaluate the appropriateness of normality assumptions in meta-analysis, enhancing methodological understanding.
Findings
Bayesian methods clarify when normality assumptions are valid.
Guidelines for avoiding hidden normality assumptions in meta-analysis.
Improved interpretation of meta-analytic results under Bayesian analysis.
Abstract
Contribution to the discussion of "When should meta-analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?" by Dan Jackson and Ian R. White (2018; https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201800071).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
