Unified theory of the direct or indirect bandgap nature of conventional semiconductors
Lin-Ding Yuan, Hui-Xiong Deng, Shu-Shen Li, Jun-Wei Luo, and Su-Huai, Wei

TL;DR
This paper presents a unified theory explaining the direct or indirect bandgap nature of conventional semiconductors based on the presence of occupied cation d bands and other factors, aiding the design of new optoelectronic materials.
Contribution
The paper introduces a unified theoretical framework that clarifies why certain semiconductors have direct or indirect bandgaps, emphasizing the role of cation d bands and other factors.
Findings
Occupied cation d bands influence bandgap nature via s-d and p-d couplings.
Diamond, Si, Ge, and Al-group III-V semiconductors lack active d bands and have indirect bandgaps.
Bond length and electronegativity also regulate conduction band energy ordering.
Abstract
Although the direct or indirect nature of the bandgap transition is an essential parameter of semiconductors for optoelectronic applications, the understanding why some of the conventional semiconductors have direct or indirect bandgaps remains ambiguous. In this Letter, we revealed that the existence of the occupied cation d bands is a prime element in determining the directness of the bandgap of semiconductors through the s-d and p-d couplings, which push the conduction band energy levels at the X- and L-valley up, but leaves the {\Gamma}-valley conduction state unchanged. This unified theory unambiguously explains why Diamond, Si, Ge, and Al-containing group III-V semiconductors, which do not have active occupied d bands, have indirect bandgaps and remaining common semiconductors, except GaP, have direct bandgaps. Besides s-d and p-d couplings, bond length and electronegativity of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
