When Lift-and-Project Cuts are Different

TL;DR

This paper introduces a method to identify irregular lift-and-project cuts in mixed-integer linear programs, revealing their non-equivalence to intersection cuts and analyzing their frequency in benchmark instances.

Contribution

It simplifies regularity verification, provides a mixed-integer formulation to detect irregular cuts, and evaluates their occurrence in benchmark problems.

Findings

Irregular lift-and-project cuts are identified using a new numerical procedure.

The method shows that some cuts are not equivalent to multi-row cuts.

Irregular cuts are present in benchmark instances, indicating their significance.

Abstract

In this paper, we present a method to determine if a lift-and-project cut for a mixed-integer linear program is irregular, in which case the cut is not equivalent to any intersection cut from the bases of the linear relaxation. This is an important question due to the intense research activity for the past decade on cuts from multiple rows of simplex tableau as well as on lift-and-project cuts from non-split disjunctions. While it is known since Balas and Perregaard (2003) that lift-and-project cuts from split disjunctions are always equivalent to intersection cuts and consequently to such multi-row cuts, Balas and Kis (2016) have recently shown that there is a necessary and sufficient condition in the case of arbitrary disjunctions: a lift-and-project cut is regular if, and only if, it corresponds to a regular basic solution of the Cut Generating Linear Program (CGLP). This paper has four contributions. First, we state a result that simplifies the verification of regularity for basic CGLP solutions from Balas and Kis (2016). Second, we provide a mixed-integer formulation that checks whether there is a regular CGLP solution for a given cut that is regular in a broader sense, which also encompasses irregular cuts that are implied by the regular cut closure. Third, we describe a numerical procedure based on such formulation that identifies irregular lift-and-project cuts. Finally, we use this method to evaluate how often lift-and-project cuts from simple $t$-branch split disjunctions are irregular, and thus not equivalent to multi-row cuts, on 74 instances of the MIPLIB benchmarks.