Media Accessibility Policy in Theory and Reality: Empirical Outreach to Audio Description Users in the United States
Philipp Jordan, Brett Oppegaard

TL;DR
This paper empirically examines the use, challenges, and opportunities of audio description for the visually impaired in the US, proposing a media ecosystem to improve its accessibility across platforms.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive empirical analysis of audio description usage and barriers, and introduces the UniDescription Project as a solution.
Findings
Audio description is used across TV, streaming, DVDs, and theaters.
Multiple barriers hinder wider adoption of audio description.
The UniDescription Project offers a potential ecosystem for improvement.
Abstract
Audio description, a form of trans-modal media translation, allows people who are blind or visually impaired access to visually-oriented, socio-cultural, or historical public discourse alike. Although audio description has gained more prominence in media policy and research lately, it rarely has been studied empirically. Yet this paper presents quantitative and qualitative survey data on its challenges and opportunities, through the analysis of responses from 483 participants in a national sample, with 334 of these respondents being blind. Our results give insight into audio description use in broadcast TV, streaming services, for physical media, such as DVDs, and in movie theaters. We further discover a multiplicity of barriers and hindrances which prevent a better adoption and larger proliferation of audio description. In our discussion, we present a possible answer to these problems…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
