TL;DR
This paper presents a model of Jupiter's formation involving three phases: rapid pebble accretion, slow planetesimal accretion to delay runaway gas accretion, and then rapid gas accretion, highlighting the roles of both solids types.
Contribution
It introduces a hybrid accretion model explaining Jupiter's slow growth phase and the transition to runaway gas accretion, integrating pebble and planetesimal accretion processes.
Findings
Jupiter's growth involved three distinct phases.
Slow planetesimal accretion delayed runaway gas accretion.
Both pebbles and planetesimals played crucial roles in Jupiter's formation.
Abstract
The standard model for giant planet formation is based on the accretion of solids by a growing planetary embryo, followed by rapid gas accretion once the planet exceeds a so-called critical mass. The dominant size of the accreted solids (cm-size particles named pebbles or km to hundred km-size bodies named planetesimals) is, however, unknown. Recently, high-precision measurements of isotopes in meteorites provided evidence for the existence of two reservoirs in the early Solar System. These reservoirs remained separated from ~1 until ~ 3 Myr after the beginning of the Solar System's formation. This separation is interpreted as resulting from Jupiter growing and becoming a barrier for material transport. In this framework, Jupiter reached ~20 Earth masses within ~1 Myr and slowly grew to ~50 Earth masses in the subsequent 2 Myr before reaching its present-day mass. The evidence that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
