The Zeckendorf Game
Paul Baird-Smith, Alyssa Epstein, Kristen Flint, Steven J. Miller

TL;DR
This paper introduces a two-player game based on Zeckendorf's theorem, analyzing strategies, bounds on game length, and showing Player 2's winning strategy for all n > 2, despite the proof being non-constructive.
Contribution
It formulates a new combinatorial game related to Zeckendorf decompositions and provides bounds and strategies, including the non-constructive proof of Player 2's winning strategy.
Findings
Game terminates in Zeckendorf decomposition
Upper bound on moves is O(n log n)
Player 2 has a winning strategy for all n > 2
Abstract
Zeckendorf proved that every positive integer can be written uniquely as the sum of non-adjacent Fibonacci numbers. We use this to create a two-player game. Given a fixed integer and an initial decomposition of , the two players alternate by using moves related to the recurrence relation , and whoever moves last wins. The game always terminates in the Zeckendorf decomposition, though depending on the choice of moves the length of the game and the winner can vary. We find upper and lower bounds on the number of moves possible. The upper bound is on the order of , and the lower bound is sharp at moves, where is the number of terms in the Zeckendorf decomposition of . Notably, Player 2 has the winning strategy for all ; interestingly, however, the proof is non-constructive.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
